From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753622AbcCJTei (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:34:38 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0167.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.167]:43957 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753254AbcCJTe2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:34:28 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2692:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3698:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3873:4250:4321:5007:6120:6261:7901:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11783:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:14659:14721:21080:30003:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:7,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: chin14_43d72a4cd431d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1631 Message-ID: <1457638462.3433.21.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: checkpatch.pl false positive: FSF mailing address From: Joe Perches To: Brian Norris Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:34:22 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20160310192818.GA9902@google.com> References: <20160310190023.GB2545@google.com> <1457636880.3433.12.camel@perches.com> <1457637955.3433.17.camel@perches.com> <20160310192818.GA9902@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:28 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:25:55AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:15 -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > checkpatch is stupid, false positives will always exist. > > I'd almost rather have people understand this. > Then perhaps I'll also patch this note out: > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report >       them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Maybe add: "but remember, CHECKPATCH is stupid, you're not".