From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:35:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457940942.11972.69.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1603140619030.2139@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 06:19 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Loggng messages that emit function names have many different forms.
> > Perhaps it'd be better for logging consistency and grep ease to
> > exclusively use "%s:"
> >
> > As well, function tracing logging uses are generally unnecessary given
> > the kernel's function tracing (ftrace) capability.
> >
> > Right now, grep shows these mixtures of forms:
> >
> > 13704 "%s:"
> > 3839 "%s "
> > 2787 "%s()"
> >
> > Some of these are macros definitions of various styles.
> >
> > Unfortunately, given the complexity of these macro definition styles,
> > checkpatch isn't an ideal tool to find these macros.
> >
> > Maybe a coccinelle script might be better suited to find and fix all
> > the various types of uses.
> >
> > Add a --fix option for these logging messages with __func__.
>
> I'm not good enough at perl to really understand this. Coudl you give an
> example of what it does, and of what it does not do?
For instance, this could do simple conversions like:
$ diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
@@ -416 +416 @@ int __init mcpm_loopback(void (*cache_disable)(void))
- pr_err("%s returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ pr_err("%s: returned %d\n", __func__, ret);
But it couldn't find/convert a string concatenation:
#define pch_dbg(adap, fmt, arg...) \
dev_dbg(adap->pch_adapter.dev.parent, "%s :" fmt, __func__, ##arg)
cheers, Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-13 19:19 [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: check formatting of __func__ output uses Joe Perches
2016-03-14 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH V2] checkpatch: Check output format style of __func__ uses Joe Perches
2016-03-14 5:19 ` Julia Lawall
2016-03-14 7:35 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-03-14 8:29 ` Julia Lawall
2016-03-14 14:07 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1457940942.11972.69.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox