From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 22:31:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we
should let such kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service
to poweroff.
This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is
unavailable, even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is no
path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.
Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
v5:
- Revert to version 2, enforce EFI poweroff for such kind
of platforms.
v4:
- Since in v3 efi_poweroff_required() is not guaranteed to run
after all of the other code that may register alternative
power off handling, add the pm_power_off_default that would
be used by pm_power_off if nothing else is available.
v3:
- Only assign pm_power_off to efi_power_off when there are no
other pm_power_off registered at that time, in case other
commponents would like to customize their own implementation.
---
v2:
- Convert the acpi_no_s5 to a global bool variable in sleep.c and
add a declaration to include/linux/acpi.h.
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
index ed30e79..7e5ec62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
@@ -340,5 +340,5 @@ bool efi_reboot_required(void)
bool efi_poweroff_required(void)
{
- return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware;
+ return acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_no_s5;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 9cb9752..a33859c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
#include "internal.h"
#include "sleep.h"
+/*
+ * Some HW-full platforms do not have _S5, so they may need
+ * to leverage efi power off for a shutdown.
+ */
+bool acpi_no_s5;
static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
@@ -846,6 +851,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
+ } else {
+ acpi_no_s5 = true;
}
supported[0] = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 06ed7e5..4d2e67f 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ void acpi_irq_stats_init(void);
extern u32 acpi_irq_handled;
extern u32 acpi_irq_not_handled;
extern unsigned int acpi_sci_irq;
+extern bool acpi_no_s5;
#define INVALID_ACPI_IRQ ((unsigned)-1)
static inline bool acpi_sci_irq_valid(void)
{
--
1.8.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-20 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-20 14:31 Chen Yu [this message]
2016-03-21 12:43 ` [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-21 14:05 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox