From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] x86/topology: Fix AMD core count
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:52:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458917557-8757-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
It turns out AMD gets x86_max_cores wrong when there are compute
units.
The issue is that Linux assumes:
nr_logical_cpus = nr_cores * nr_siblings
But AMD reports its CU unit as 2 cores, but then sets num_smp_siblings
to 2 as well.
Boris: fixup ras/mce_amd_inj.c too, to compute the Node Base Core
properly, according to the new nomenclature.
Reported-by: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Fixes: 1f12e32f4cd5 ("x86/topology: Create logical package id")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160317095220.GO6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index 20a3de5cb3b0..66b057306f40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static inline int wbinvd_on_all_cpus(void)
wbinvd();
return 0;
}
+#define smp_num_siblings 1
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
extern unsigned disabled_cpus;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index b39338c4b260..b8d7f3012340 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -310,9 +310,9 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
node_id = ecx & 7;
/* get compute unit information */
- smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1;
+ cores_per_cu = smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1;
+ c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xff;
- cores_per_cu += ((ebx >> 8) & 3);
} else if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {
u64 value;
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
u32 cus_per_node;
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM);
- cores_per_node = c->x86_max_cores / nodes_per_socket;
- cus_per_node = cores_per_node / cores_per_cu;
+ cus_per_node = c->x86_max_cores / nodes_per_socket;
+ cores_per_node = cus_per_node * cores_per_cu;
/* store NodeID, use llc_shared_map to store sibling info */
per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id;
diff --git a/arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c b/arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c
index 55d38cfa46c2..9e02dcaef683 100644
--- a/arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c
+++ b/arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <asm/mce.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <asm/amd_nb.h>
#include <asm/irq_vectors.h>
@@ -206,7 +207,7 @@ static u32 get_nbc_for_node(int node_id)
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
u32 cores_per_node;
- cores_per_node = c->x86_max_cores / amd_get_nodes_per_socket();
+ cores_per_node = (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings) / amd_get_nodes_per_socket();
return cores_per_node * node_id;
}
--
2.7.3
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 14:52 Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-03-25 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf/amd: Cleanup Fam10h NB event constraints Borislav Petkov
2016-03-25 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: Get rid of compute_unit_id Borislav Petkov
2016-03-29 8:49 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-03-25 14:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/Documentation: Start documenting x86 topology Borislav Petkov
2016-03-28 9:56 ` [PATCH 4/4 -v1.1] " Borislav Petkov
2016-03-29 8:50 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458917557-8757-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=aherrmann@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox