From: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"prarit@redhat.com" <prarit@redhat.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Jovanovic, Radivoje" <radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com>,
"s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com" <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"David Rajamanickam,
Ajay Thomas" <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"minipli@googlemail.com" <minipli@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement time window checks
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:07:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459188473.13525.33.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458563236-19269-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
+Jacob
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 08:27 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> This was submitted back in December and not picked up after review.
>
> P.
>
> -----8<----
> The Intel ASDM provides a maximum time window that can be specified
> when
> setting a time window in the RAPL driver. While the ASDM doesn't
> explicitly
> provide a minimum time window value, it does provide a minimum time
> window
> unit that also can be used as a minimum value.
>
> This patchset implements barrier checking for the time windows, and
> adds
> reporting of a known bug in which the maxmimum time window value may
> be
> erroneously set to 0, as well as a module parameter to avoid the
> maximum
> window checks on broken BIOSes.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com>
> Cc: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>
> Prarit Bhargava (3):
> powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window
> powercap, intel_rapl, implement check for minimum time window
> powercap, intel_rapl, Add ignore_max_time_window_check module
> parameter for broken BIOSes
>
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 50
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c | 6 +++--
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 12:27 [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement time window checks Prarit Bhargava
2016-03-21 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement get_max_time_window Prarit Bhargava
2016-03-31 18:28 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2016-04-05 13:14 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-04-11 11:33 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-04-11 14:11 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2016-03-21 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] powercap, intel_rapl, implement check for minimum time window Prarit Bhargava
2016-03-21 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] powercap, intel_rapl, Add ignore_max_time_window_check module parameter for broken BIOSes Prarit Bhargava
2016-03-28 18:07 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459188473.13525.33.camel@intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
--cc=ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=radivoje.jovanovic@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=s.ikarashi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).