From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok [ver #3]
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:49:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459529396.2657.68.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29226.1459521213@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 15:33 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > The only place where "KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION" is specified is in
> > load_system_certificate_list(), when adding keys to
> > the .builtin_trusted_keys keyring. There is no other set of keys
> > builtin and added to the IMA keyring.
>
> Are the keys loaded by integrity_load_x509() required to be validly signed by
> the builtin/secondary keys? Or is that unnecessary given that they are loaded
> and thus protected through integrity_read_file()?
Loading keys on the IMA keyring is safe, because the certificates must
be signed by a key on the builtin keyring or the secondary keyring, if
it is Kconfig enabled.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 11:18 [RFC PATCH 00/12] KEYS: Restrict additions to 'trusted' keyrings [ver #3] David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] KEYS: Generalise system_verify_data() to provide access to internal content " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] PKCS#7: Make trust determination dependent on contents of trust keyring " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] KEYS: Move x509_request_asymmetric_key() to asymmetric_type.c " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] KEYS: Generalise x509_request_asymmetric_key() " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:18 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] X.509: Use verify_signature() if we have a struct key * to use " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] X.509: Move the trust validation code out to its own file " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] KEYS: Make the system trusted keyring depend on the asymmetric key type " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] KEYS: Move the point of trust determination to __key_link() " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] KEYS: Remove KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED and KEY_ALLOC_TRUSTED " David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically " David Howells
2016-04-06 0:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-04-06 16:12 ` David Howells
2016-03-09 11:19 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings instead of .ima_mok " David Howells
2016-03-28 11:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-03-30 16:19 ` David Howells
2016-03-31 12:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-03-31 15:18 ` David Howells
2016-03-31 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-03-31 22:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-04-01 14:33 ` David Howells
2016-04-01 16:49 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2016-04-01 14:06 ` David Howells
2016-04-01 17:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-04-05 20:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-04-06 16:13 ` David Howells
2016-04-06 16:47 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459529396.2657.68.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox