From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:27:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:27:09 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:51460 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:26:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 11:26:50 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Working reiserfsck? Message-ID: <146010000.997198010@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20010802133051.A88@toy.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, August 02, 2001 01:30:55 PM +0000 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > On one of my machines, I installed reiserfs on / fs.... and got to habit > of just powering that machine down with powerswitch. I was running > various kernels at least from 2.4.3 on it. > > Now I tried to run reiserfsck, and (besides it having very ugly UI) it > reported some problems. Question is, how to correct those? reiserfsck > attitude seems to be "run me and I'll kill your filesystem". Is it really > that dangerous? Where to get working reiserfsck? > Pavel The best reiserfsck version right now is in ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre It should fix the problem, backups are always handy though. -chris