From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, terry.rudd@hpe.com,
waiman.long@hpe.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
jason.low2@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH] MCS spinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire()
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:29:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460496564.2465.128.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
Hi Peter,
This patch applies on top of the "smp_cond_load_acquire + cmpwait"
series.
---
For qspinlocks on ARM64, we would like use WFE instead of
purely spinning. Qspinlocks internally have lock
contenders spin on an MCS lock.
Update arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended() such that it uses
the new smp_cond_load_acquire() so that ARM64 can also
override this spin loop with its own implementation using WFE.
On x86, it can also cheaper to use this than spinning on
smp_load_acquire().
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
---
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index c835270..5f21f23 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -22,13 +22,13 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended
/*
- * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that ensures
- * subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired.
+ * Using smp_cond_load_acquire() provides the acquire semantics
+ * required so that subsequent operations happen after the
+ * lock is acquired.
*/
#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l) \
do { \
- while (!(smp_load_acquire(l))) \
- cpu_relax_lowlatency(); \
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&l, VAL); \
} while (0)
#endif
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-12 21:29 Jason Low [this message]
2016-04-12 22:39 ` [PATCH] MCS spinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire() kbuild test robot
2016-04-12 23:40 ` Jason Low
2016-04-12 23:50 ` Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460496564.2465.128.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=terry.rudd@hpe.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox