From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752016AbcDPTxM (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:53:12 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18718 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751614AbcDPTxK (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:53:10 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,493,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="933877083" From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" To: "bp@alien8.de" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linuxwifi , "Dreyfuss, Haim" , "Coelho, Luciano" , "Berg, Johannes" , "kvalo@codeaurora.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Sharon, Sara" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2485 at drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c:1752 iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access+0x110/0x120 [iwlwifi] Thread-Topic: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2485 at drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c:1752 iwl_trans_pcie_grab_nic_access+0x110/0x120 [iwlwifi] Thread-Index: AQHRlqrAhqNxKohaXkWOO61GIGrhqp+KO2oAgAJSfgCAAEWlAA== Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:53:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1460836384.2998.3.camel@intel.com> References: <20160415020710.GA2700@cz.tnic> <1460693762.2648.5.camel@intel.com> <20160416154348.GA2069@cz.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20160416154348.GA2069@cz.tnic> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.254.151.73] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <90F0D80EF537604F89F5D6A3EFEF146F@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u3GJrHuj009009 On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 17:43 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:02AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > > [1] > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/backport-iwlwi > > fi.git/ > > It is very strange to pull from this repo, git fetch is doing > something > for a while now without any forward progress. This is not surprising at all. This tree is not a kernel tree, but rather a backport tree. It doesn't contain anything besides the Wifi stack and the backport code. It has no common commit with the Linux kernel. I understand that you fetched this tree from a kernel tree but that's not a good idea. Git will try to find a common ancestor but that will fail... after a huge number of tentatives. You'd better clone it. > In any case, 4.5 is bad too, testing 4.4 now. Here you go. > I 'm travelling currently > so the whole bisection deal will take a whole but I'll get to it > eventually. I'll be glad to see something coming out of this, but I can't say I am very optimistic. > > Thanks for taking a look. >