linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	terry.rudd@hpe.com, "Long, Wai Man" <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"dave@stgolabs.net" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	jason.low2@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm64: Implement WFE based spin wait for MCS spinlocks
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:36:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461181011.3113.75.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420103059.GX3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 12:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:13:38AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > Use WFE to avoid most spinning with MCS spinlocks. This is implemented
> > with the new cmpwait() mechanism for comparing and waiting for the MCS
> > locked value to change using LDXR + WFE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d295d9d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +#ifndef __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +#define __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +
> > +#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)					\
> > +do {									\
> > +	int locked_val;							\
> > +	for (;;) {							\
> > +		locked_val = READ_ONCE(*l);				\
> > +		if (locked_val)						\
> > +			break;						\
> > +		cmpwait(l, locked_val);					\
> > +	}								\
> > +	smp_rmb();							\
> > +} while (0)
> 
> If you make the generic version use smp_cond_load_acquire() this isn't
> needed.

Yup, in the email thread about modifying the generic version to use
smp_cond_load_acquire(), I mentioned that overriding it in arch/arm64
would not be needed anymore.

Will made a suggestion about overriding it on arm64, but it turns out he
was just referring to avoiding the immediate dependency on
smp_cond_load_acquire().

Thanks,
Jason

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14  7:13 [RFC] arm64: Implement WFE based spin wait for MCS spinlocks Jason Low
2016-04-20 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 19:36   ` Jason Low [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461181011.3113.75.camel@j-VirtualBox \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=terry.rudd@hpe.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).