linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, terry.rudd@hpe.com,
	waiman.long@hpe.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	jason.low2@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] MCS spinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire() in spin loop
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:51:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461181879.3113.83.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)

This patch applies on top of:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git locking/rfc

---
For qspinlocks on ARM64, we would like to use WFE instead
of purely spinning. Qspinlocks internally have lock
contenders spin on an MCS lock.

Update arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended() such that it uses
the new smp_cond_load_acquire() so that ARM64 can also
override this spin loop with its own implementation using WFE.

On x86, this can also be cheaper than spinning on
smp_load_acquire().

Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
- Add additional comments about the use of smp_cond_load_acquire().

v1 -> v2:
- Pass l instead of &l to smp_cond_load_acquire() since
  l is already a pointer to the lock variable.
 kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index c835270..c19ce41 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -22,13 +22,15 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
 
 #ifndef arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended
 /*
- * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that ensures
- * subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired.
+ * Using smp_cond_load_acquire() provides the acquire semantics
+ * required so that subsequent operations happen after the
+ * lock is acquired. Additionally, some architectures such as
+ * ARM64 would like to do spin-waiting instead of purely
+ * spinning, and smp_cond_load_acquire() provides that behavior.
  */
 #define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)					\
 do {									\
-	while (!(smp_load_acquire(l)))					\
-		cpu_relax_lowlatency();					\
+	smp_cond_load_acquire(l, VAL);					\
 } while (0)
 #endif
 
-- 
2.1.4

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461181879.3113.83.camel@j-VirtualBox \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=terry.rudd@hpe.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).