From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756957AbcEDBGW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 21:06:22 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:34746 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756867AbcEDBGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 21:06:21 -0400 Message-ID: <1462323974.4315.1.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch: add Kconfig 'default n' test From: Yingjoe Chen To: Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches CC: , Andi Kleen , "Paul Bolle" , Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:06:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1461335527-19270-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> References: <1461335527-19270-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 22:32 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > If a Kconfig config option doesn't specify 'default', the default > will be n. Adding 'default n' is unnecessary. > > Add a test to warn about this. > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen > --- > Change in v2: > - Change according to Joe Perches' suggestion > > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index d574d13..3cb7c2d 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -2600,6 +2600,13 @@ sub process { > "Use of boolean is deprecated, please use bool instead.\n" . $herecurr); > } > > +# discourage the use of default n > + if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ && > + $line =~ /^\+\s*default\s*n\s*(#.*|$)/i) { > + WARN("CONFIG_DEFAULT_N", > + "Use of default n is unnecessary, default is n when omitted.\n" . $herecurr); > + } > + > if (($realfile =~ /Makefile.*/ || $realfile =~ /Kbuild.*/) && > ($line =~ /\+(EXTRA_[A-Z]+FLAGS).*/)) { > my $flag = $1; Hi, Any suggestion for this new round? Joe.C