From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752037AbcEJNzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 09:55:19 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:48665 "EHLO metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751695AbcEJNzQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 09:55:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1462888497.9155.9.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/21] reset: uniphier: add core support for UniPhier reset driver From: Philipp Zabel To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Guenter Roeck , Kalle Valo , Jiri Slaby , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:54:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1462873862-30940-13-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <1462873862-30940-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1462873862-30940-13-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 10.05.2016, 18:50 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada: [...] > +static int uniphier_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, > + unsigned long id, bool assert) > +{ > + struct uniphier_reset_priv *priv = to_uniphier_reset_priv(rcdev); > + const struct uniphier_reset_data *p; > + bool handled = false; > + > + for (p = priv->data; p->id != UNIPHIER_RESET_ID_END; p++) { > + unsigned int val; > + int ret; > + > + if (p->id != id) > + continue; > + > + val = p->deassert_val; > + if (assert) > + val = ~val; > + > + ret = regmap_write_bits(priv->regmap, p->reg, p->mask, val); What is the difference between mask and deassert_val? Couldn't you just assign val = assert ? 0 : p->mask; ? > +static const struct reset_control_ops uniphier_reset_ops = { > + .assert = uniphier_reset_assert, > + .deassert = uniphier_reset_deassert, > + .status = uniphier_reset_status, > +}; > + > +int uniphier_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > + const struct uniphier_reset_data *data) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct uniphier_reset_priv *priv; > + const struct uniphier_reset_data *p; > + struct regmap *regmap; > + unsigned int nr_resets = 0; > + > + /* parent should be MFD and syscon node */ > + regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node); > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get regmap\n"); syscon_node_to_regmap can return different error codes. It might be helpful to use dev_err(dev, "failed to get regmap: %d\n", PTR_ERR(regmap)); here. regards Philipp