From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
peter@hurleysoftware.com, jason.low2@hpe.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock slowpath
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:49:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462992562.2488.26.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511183328.GA10711@linux-uzut.site>
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 11:33 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 12:16:37PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> >> When acquiring the rwsem write lock in the slowpath, we first try
> >> to set count to RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS. When that is successful,
> >> we then atomically add the RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS in cases where
> >> there are other tasks on the wait list. This causes write lock
> >> operations to often issue multiple atomic operations.
> >>
> >> We can instead make the list_is_singular() check first, and then
> >> set the count accordingly, so that we issue at most 1 atomic
> >> operation when acquiring the write lock and reduce unnecessary
> >> cacheline contention.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
>
> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>
> (one nit: the patch title could be more informative to what
> optimization we are talking about here... ie: reduce atomic ops
> in writer slowpath' or something.)
Yeah, the "optimize write lock slowpath" subject is a bit generic. I'll
make the title more specific in the next version.
Thanks,
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 19:16 [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock slowpath Jason Low
2016-05-10 2:25 ` Waiman Long
2016-05-11 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:26 ` Jason Low
2016-05-11 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-11 18:49 ` Jason Low [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462992562.2488.26.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox