From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752670AbcEMAef (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 20:34:35 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:63339 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381AbcEMAee (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 20:34:34 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,611,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="979139715" Message-ID: <1463099644.991.25.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, 0/3] intel_pstate: Improvements related to the APERF/MPERF computation From: Srinivas Pandruvada To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 17:34:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4400018.TlI4RAhtYU@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2638272.Bq3MnQEe4U@vostro.rjw.lan> <4400018.TlI4RAhtYU@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3 (3.18.3-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 19:06 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, May 07, 2016 01:42:53 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As per the subject, on top of the current linux-next branch of > > linux-pm.git. > > This version has been reworked to retain more APERF bits after > carrying out the > \Delta_{APERF}/\Delta_{MPERF} which should lead to a bit more precise > numbers > in sysfs etc. Tested the series and looks fine now. Thanks, Srinivas > > Thanks, > Rafael