From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
terry.rudd@hpe.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock by reducing operations in slowpath
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:10:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463429413.11781.4.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
When acquiring the rwsem write lock in the slowpath, we first try
to set count to RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS. When that is successful,
we then atomically add the RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS in cases where
there are other tasks on the wait list. This causes write lock
operations to often issue multiple atomic operations.
We can instead make the list_is_singular() check first, and then
set the count accordingly, so that we issue at most 1 atomic
operation when acquiring the write lock and reduce unnecessary
cacheline contention.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index df4dcb8..956f088 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -255,17 +255,28 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
+/*
+ * This function must be called with the sem->wait_lock held to prevent
+ * race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
+ * sem->count accordingly.
+ */
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
/*
- * Try acquiring the write lock. Check count first in order
- * to reduce unnecessary expensive cmpxchg() operations.
+ * Avoid trying to acquire write lock if count isn't RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS.
*/
- if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
- cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
- if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
- rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
+ if (count != RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Acquire the lock by trying to set it to ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS. If there
+ * are other tasks on the wait list, we need to add on WAITING_BIAS.
+ */
+ count = list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list) ?
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS :
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+
+ if (cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, count) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
rwsem_set_owner(sem);
return true;
}
--
2.1.4
reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463429413.11781.4.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=terry.rudd@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox