From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753438AbcFBMtf (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:49:35 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:56208 "EHLO metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751338AbcFBMtd (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:49:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1464871741.3307.16.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Documentation/devicetree/bindings: Add b850v3_lvds_dp From: Philipp Zabel To: Peter Senna Tschudin Cc: airlied@linux.ie, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, enric.balletbo@collabora.com, galak@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, heiko@sntech.de, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, jslaby@suse.cz, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, mark.rutland@arm.com, martin.donnelly@ge.com, martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com, treding@nvidia.com, ykk@rock-chips.com Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:49:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1464626385-19253-4-git-send-email-peter.senna@collabora.com> References: <1464626385-19253-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@collabora.com> <1464626385-19253-4-git-send-email-peter.senna@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, Am Montag, den 30.05.2016, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Peter Senna Tschudin: > Devicetree bindings documentation for the GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ > display bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..32e123a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3_lvds_dp.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ > +Driver for GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ display bridge > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible : should be "ge,b850v3_lvds_dp". In the cover mail you write that this is a combination of the STDP4028 DP transmitter and STDP2690 DP/DP++ converter. So shouldn't this binding comprise two device tree nodes, one with compatible "st,stdp4028", one with "st,stdp2690", then? Is the stdp2690 connected to the stdp4028's i2c master? regards Philipp