From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753176AbcFOHBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 03:01:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:38684 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753084AbcFOHBg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 03:01:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1465974093.4219.14.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rfc patch] sched/fair: Use instantaneous load for fork/exec balancing From: Mike Galbraith To: Yuyang Du Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:01:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160614224218.GK8105@intel.com> References: <1465891111.1694.13.camel@gmail.com> <20160614224218.GK8105@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 06:42 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote: > I am entirely for giving it a "clear unadulterated reality", and even > more for it an option. > > Reviewed-by: Yuyang Du Thanks. I'll have a look at perhaps having wake_affine to the same, such that there is a clean separation of wake/LB paths. I suppose I should also try harder to sprinkle some 'pretty' on it, that's always the hardest part for a master of fugly :) -Mike