From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>,
Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>,
Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 20/28] staging/lustre/mdc: Zero atime in close RPC
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:07:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466388463-1817551-21-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466388463-1817551-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
From: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>
While atime on close is supposed to only increase, there's
a bug in some older server versions where atime from a client
is taken no matter the value that allows a stale client atime
to overwrite a correct value.
Update atime in close rpc to 0 to help such servers out.
Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/19932
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8041
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
index 2703113..143bd76 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
@@ -467,6 +467,18 @@ void mdc_close_pack(struct ptlrpc_request *req, struct md_op_data *op_data)
rec = req_capsule_client_get(&req->rq_pill, &RMF_REC_REINT);
mdc_setattr_pack_rec(rec, op_data);
+ /*
+ * The client will zero out local timestamps when losing the IBITS lock
+ * so any new RPC timestamps will update the client inode's timestamps.
+ * There was a defect on the server side which allowed the atime to be
+ * overwritten by a zeroed-out atime packed into the close RPC.
+ *
+ * Proactively clear the MDS_ATTR_ATIME flag in the RPC in this case
+ * to avoid zeroing the atime on old unpatched servers. See LU-8041.
+ */
+ if (rec->sa_atime == 0)
+ rec->sa_valid &= ~MDS_ATTR_ATIME;
+
mdc_ioepoch_pack(epoch, op_data);
mdc_hsm_release_pack(req, op_data);
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 2:07 [PATCH 00/28] Lustre fixes Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 01/28] staging/lustre/llite: allocate and free client cache asynchronously Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 02/28] staging/lustre/llite: correct request handling after ll_lookup_it() Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 03/28] staging/lustre/llite: Get rid of ll_lock_dcache/ll_unlock_dcache Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 04/28] staging/lustre/llite: lock i_lock before __d_drop() Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 05/28] staging/lustre/osc: osc_lock_weight endless loop fix Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 06/28] staging/lustre/osc: Fix reverted condition in osc_lock_weight Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 07/28] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: reorganize ptlrpc_request Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 08/28] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: missing wakeup for ptlrpc_check_set Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 09/28] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: Early Reply vs Reply MDunlink Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 10/28] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: Remove __ptlrpc_request_bufs_pack Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 11/28] staging/lustre/ptlrpc: lost bulk leads to a hang Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 12/28] staging/lustre/llite: take trunc_sem only at vvp layer Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 13/28] staging/lustre: LDLM_DEBUG() shouldn't be passed \n Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 14/28] staging/lustre: Add newline to LU_OBJECT_DEBUG() message Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 15/28] staging/lustre/llite: flatten struct lookup_intent Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 16/28] staging/lustre: Inline Lustre intent disposition functions Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 17/28] staging/lustre/llite: change it_data to it_request Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 18/28] staging/lustre/ldlm: const qualify struct lustre_handle * params Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 19/28] staging/lustre/llite: ensure obd is effective in onu_upcall Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 21/28] staging/lustre/o2ib: Don't access NULL NI on failure path Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 22/28] staging/lustre/llite: don't panic when fid is insane Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 23/28] staging/lustre/llite: Restore proper opencache operations Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 24/28] staging/lustre/llite: ll_revalidate_dentry update Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 25/28] staging/lustre/llite: IOC_MDC_GETFILEINFO returns the wrong ino Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 26/28] staging/lustre/osc: fix signed one bit field Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 27/28] staging/lustre: Add documentation for unstable_stats in sysfs Oleg Drokin
2016-06-20 2:07 ` [PATCH 28/28] staging/lustre/osc: glimpse lock should match only with granted locks Oleg Drokin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466388463-1817551-21-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru \
--to=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=yawei.niu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox