Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dm: add infrastructure for DAX support

["Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>]

On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 21:49 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23 2016 at  7:36pm -0400,
> Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
 :
> > Thanks for the update.  I have a question about the above change.  Targets
> > may have their own parameters.  For instance, dm-stripe has 'chunk_size',
> > which is checked in stripe_ctr().  DAX adds additional restriction that
> > chunk_size needs to be aligned by page size.  So, I think we need to keep
> > target responsible to verify if DAX can be supported.  What do you think?
>
> We've never had to concern the dm-stripe target with hardware
> specific chunk_size validation.  The user is able to specify the
> chunk_size via lvm2's lvcreate -I argument.  Yes this gives users enough
> rope to hang themselves but it is very easy to configure a dm-stripe
> device with the appropriate chunk size (PAGE_SIZE) from userspace.
> 
> But lvm2 could even be trained to make sure the chunk_size is a factor
> of physical_block_size (PAGE_SIZE in the case of pmem) if the underlying
> devices export queue/dax=1

lvcreate -I only allows multiple of page size, so we are OK with lvm2.  I was
wondering if the check in lvm2 is enough.  Are there any other tools that may
be used to configure stripe size?  Can we trust userspace on this?

Thanks,
-Toshi