From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:32:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467088360-10186-1-git-send-email-bsd@redhat.com> (raw)
These patches are based on reviews to my RFC
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg134440.html
Changes since RFC:
- Remove shadow_xonly_valid, it's not needed
- Remove checks from is_shadow_present_pte()
- In reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask, pass correct execonly to __reset_rsvds_bits_mask_ept
- Reuse shadow_user_mask in set_spte()
- Remove is_present_gpte() and inline the operation at the two call sites
I spoke to Paolo about this a while back and thought to post this as
RFC while I am thinking of adding some unit tests.
Background: ESX refuses to run as L1 if support for EPT execute only isn't
found. I am not really sure if it uses it for anything since just advertising
the bits seems to work but adding the necessary plumbing seemed like a good idea.
Xiao, I took the liberty of adding you based on "git blame" :)
Thanks in advance.
Bandan Das (5):
mmu: mark spte present if the x bit is set
mmu: pass execonly value when initializing rsvd bits
mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally
mmu: remove is_present_gpte()
nvmx: advertise support for ept execute only
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 5 -----
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 4:32 Bandan Das [this message]
2016-06-28 4:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmu: mark spte present if the x bit is set Bandan Das
2016-06-28 8:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-28 17:33 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-28 20:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-28 20:37 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-28 20:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-28 21:04 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-29 3:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-05 3:06 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-05 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 11:29 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-06-28 4:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmu: pass execonly value when initializing rsvd bits Bandan Das
2016-06-29 3:07 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-28 4:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally Bandan Das
2016-06-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-28 17:30 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-28 20:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 5:50 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-05 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-29 3:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-29 8:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-30 7:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-28 4:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmu: remove is_present_gpte() Bandan Das
2016-06-28 4:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvmx: advertise support for ept execute only Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467088360-10186-1-git-send-email-bsd@redhat.com \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).