From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752622AbcF2FQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:16:50 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0113.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.113]:40965 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbcF2FQt (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:16:49 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1560:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3867:3870:3871:4321:5007:10004:10400:10848:11658:11914:12050:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:14721:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: unit98_3b13db9c61f0f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1307 Message-ID: <1467177404.24287.99.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async From: Joe Perches To: Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Andrew Morton Cc: Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , Tetsuo Handa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Byungchul Park , Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:16:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160629050835.GA730@swordfish> References: <20160513131848.2087-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20160629050835.GA730@swordfish> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 14:08 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > the patch to fix the async KERN_CONT printk regression I mentioned > several days ago in another thread. KERN_CONT is effectively a no-op. This is any printk without a KERN_