From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752656AbcF3UmY (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:42:24 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:6858 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752073AbcF3UmX (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:42:23 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,553,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="838259378" Message-ID: <1467319339.22178.256.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [patch] crypto: sha256-mb - cleanup a || vs | typo From: Tim Chen To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Dan Carpenter , Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Megha Dey , "Wang, Rui Y" , Denys Vlasenko , Xiaodong Liu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:42:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8538242a-eab7-127e-e47e-26027fee4f6d@zytor.com> References: <20160629144242.GE22818@mwanda> <8538242a-eab7-127e-e47e-26027fee4f6d@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 (3.18.5.2-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 10:05 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/29/16 07:42, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > and | behave basically the same here but || is intended.  It causes a > > static checker warning to mix up bitwise and logical operations. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c > > index c9d5dcc..4ec895a 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256-mb/sha256_mb.c > > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct sha256_hash_ctx *sha256_ctx_mgr_submit(struct sha256_ctx_mgr *mgr, > >    * Or if the user's buffer contains less than a whole block, > >    * append as much as possible to the extra block. > >    */ > > - if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) | (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) { > > + if ((ctx->partial_block_buffer_length) || (len < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE)) { > >   /* Compute how many bytes to copy from user buffer into > >    * extra block > >    */ > > > As far as I know the | was an intentional optimization, so you may way > to look at the generated code. > > -hpa > Yes, this is an intentional optimization.  Is there any scenario where things may break with the compiler? Tim