From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, hekuang@huawei.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, wangnan0@huawei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU cpumasks
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:04:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467907474-3290-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm trying to make the perf tool play better with PMUs in heterogeneous systems
(e.g. big.LITTLE). These patches fix some brokenness that exists today, but
they require the addition of a cpumask file to each CPU PMU sysfs directory,
and this happens to break prior versions of perf-stat. Due to this, I have not
yet added a cpumask attribute to the ARM PMU code.
In these system we have separate logical PMUs for discrete sets of CPUs. For
example, on an ARM Juno system we have a logical PMU for all Cortex-A53 CPUs,
and a logical PMU for all the Cortex-A57 CPUs. The logical PMUs allow
task-bound events, but reject CPU-bound events for CPUs they do not cover.
Currently perf-record doesn't work for these PMUs, unless forced to use
per-thread mmaps. In the absence of a cpumask, it tries to open events on CPUs
not supported by a PMU, and gives up. In the presence of a cpumask, it ends up
failing to mmap, as the evlist->cpus map contains a different set of cpus from
the evsel->cpus map populated from the cpumask.
Today's perf-stat can profile a task in the absence of a cpumask file, but in
the presence of one ends up blocking after the profiled task exits. Due to an
inconsistency between __perf_evsel__open and read_counter, it ends up treating
some uninitialised memory as a file descriptor, and typically ends up blocked
on stdin. That can avoided as in patch 1, but existing binaries would be broken
by the addition of the cpumask kernel-side.
I understand that we need a sysfs cpumask for the tools to work with uncore
PMUs in system-wide mode, but it's not clear to me whether we expect/want a
cpumask for the heterogeneous CPU PMU case, given the issue with perf-stat.
Does using a sysfs cpumask to handle (heterogeneous) CPU PMUs feel like the
right approach?
If using a cpumask is the right approach, how can I avoid breaking existing
perf-stat? Does it make sense to have a differently-named cpumask file that
only new tools will look at?
Thanks,
Mark.
Mark Rutland (3):
perf stat: balance opening and reading events
perf: util: Add more cpu_map helpers
perf: util: only open events on CPUs an evsel permits
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 8 ++++++--
tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 2 ++
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 9 ++++++++-
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 16:04 Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-07-07 16:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf stat: balance opening and reading events Mark Rutland
2016-07-07 16:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] perf: util: Add more cpu_map helpers Mark Rutland
2016-07-07 16:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf: util: only open events on CPUs an evsel permits Mark Rutland
2016-07-08 7:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-11 10:50 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467907474-3290-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).