From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org, fweisbec@redhat.com, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com,
efault@gmx.de, tglx@linutronix.de, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 11:56:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467993409.13253.31.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4738023a-adcf-69b5-5856-12c4dc619363@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]
On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 16:34 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 08/07/2016 15:19, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 14:30 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:35:50PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> > > > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq.
> > > > Instead, have softirq and hardirq track their time spent
> > > > independently, with the softirq code subtracting hardirq
> > > > time that happened during the duration of the softirq run.
> > > >
> > > > The softirq code can be interrupted by hardirq code at
> > > > any point in time, but it can check whether it got a
> > > > consistent snapshot of the timekeeping variables it wants,
> > > > and loop around in the unlikely case that it did not.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > So the purpose is to get rid of local_irq_save/restore()?
> > > Is it really worth such complication?
> >
> > local_irq_save/restore are quite slow, and look like the
> > largest source of overhead in irq time accounting.
>
> I'm looking at an upstream tree, without your patches applied,
> but it seems to me that irqtime_account_irq is always called with
> interrupts disabled:
>
> irqtime_account_irq
> -> account_irq_enter_time
> -> __irq_enter
> -> HARDIRQ_ENTER [1]
> -> irq_enter [3]
> -> __do_softirq [1]
> -> account_irq_exit_time
> -> __do_softirq [1]
> -> __irq_exit
> -> HARDIRQ_EXIT [1]
> -> irq_exit [2]
>
> [1] = does local_irq_disable/enable
> [2] = contains WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled())
> [3] = calls rcu_irq_enter(), which checks irqs_disabled()
>
> I don't think your first two patches change this, so perhaps it's
> enough
> to remove that local_irq-save/restore? Either this, or
> ENEEDWEEKEND...
I think you are right!
__do_softirq() calls account_irq_enter_time() with irqs
already disabled, and also has irqs disabled when it
calls account_irq_exit_time()
This appears to be true for both ksoftirqd and softirq
from irq context.
This could simplify my patch series a lot :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: count actually elapsed irq & softirq time riel
2016-07-05 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:08 ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-05 14:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 16:47 ` [PATCH v3 " Rik van Riel
2016-07-06 14:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] nohz,cputime: replace VTIME_GEN irq time code with IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] irqtime: add irq type parameter to irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-07-08 12:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 13:19 ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-08 14:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 14:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-08 15:56 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2016-07-08 23:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle Nikolay Borisov
2016-07-05 13:09 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467993409.13253.31.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox