From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752709AbcGMIVL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:21:11 -0400
Received: from fallback5.mail.ru ([94.100.181.253]:46597 "EHLO
	fallback5.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751623AbcGMIVF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:21:05 -0400
From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZCBCZXJnbWFubg==?= <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBCcm93bg==?= <broonie@kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBSdXRsYW5k?= <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?B?Um9iIEhlcnJpbmc=?= <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtQQVRDSCB2MiAyLzJdIHNwaTogYWRkIERUIGJpbmRpbmcgZm9yIGNs?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cHM3MTF4IFNQSQ==?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mail.Ru Mailer 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [217.119.30.118]
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:20:00 +0300
Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFNoaXlhbg==?= <shc_work@mail.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1468398000.319627182@f165.i.mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Mras: OK
X-Spam: undefined
In-Reply-To: <9132787.CoNHcRuYpT@wuerfel>
References: <20160707094952.4111577-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20160712204947.GA6182@rob-hp-laptop>
 <9132787.CoNHcRuYpT@wuerfel>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u6D8LUAH001575

>Среда, 13 июля 2016, 11:13 +03:00 от Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>
>On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:49:47 PM CEST Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > +
>> > +An additional register is present in the system controller,
>> > +which is assumed to be in the same device tree, with and marked
>> > +as compatible with "cirrus,ep7209-syscon3".
>> > +
>> > +Example:
>> > +
>> > +spi@80000500 {
>> > +     #address-cells = <1>;
>> > +     #size-cells = <0>;
>> > +     compatible = "cirrus,ep7209-spi";
>> > +     reg = <0x80000500 0x4>;
>> > +     interrupts = <15>;
>> > +     clocks = <&clks CLPS711X_CLK_SPI>;
>> > +     status = "disabled";
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +syscon3: syscon@80002200 {
>> 
>> This looks like it shouldn't be here.
>
>The label, or the entire node?

I think that the whole syscon3 node is redundant.

---