From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751718AbcGRDc3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:32:29 -0400 Received: from alt42.smtp-out.videotron.ca ([23.233.128.29]:51943 "EHLO alt42.smtp-out.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751421AbcGRDcL (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:32:11 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=YqOvP9sX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=keA3yYpnlypCNW5BNWqu+w==:117 a=keA3yYpnlypCNW5BNWqu+w==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=cAmyUtKerLwA:10 a=KKAkSRfTAAAA:8 a=YklBYVjI09Oj6rDWnLAA:9 a=cvBusfyB2V15izCimMoJ:22 From: Nicolas Pitre To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro , David Howells , Greg Ungerer Subject: [PULL REQUEST] [PATCH v2 00/10] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:31:46 -0400 Message-Id: <1468812716-30537-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNQSClKjFWfnmyfM9ZLee01c/NVWLuw6PJ7EtTrL7i2cc5sdbkL60LgIcekSARh1nklodtjA9ng7ipC0K6kKwtAjAseaIYZfih9V3GKi98HglYtiyOHJ s/+nMPutOJwSyq4cB7bYBGfKGci6V6sIxYQFWjDVPex38xCFquFH/JWrfu2wQgmBLH+7vYJVll0l46JX2eY6LvNQ75buQeHoI1M2McZprvJO75P34N1D21Jd Ne8J6YKi9TMU43OpZc5CgWJGbkhJXddlQ9TLEB9+mrZlQm8+yyJgrFzhdUikLNkMc5HAMco7QZo7FIU/bYHQLw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU. This can also be found in the following git repo: git://git.linaro.org/people/nicolas.pitre/linux binfmt_flat_with_mmu *Why?* Because developing and testing natively on a large system with lots of RAM makes it so much more convenient to use all the existing profiling tools and debugging facilities that a kernel with lots of RAM can give. And incidentally, those systems with lots of RAM all have a MMU. *Why not use elf_fdpic?* The flat executable format is simple with very small footprint overhead, either in the executables themselves or kernel support. This makes the flat format more suitable than elf_fdpic for very small single-user-app embedded systems. And while elf_fdpic binaries can run on MMU systems, flat binaries still couldn't, which just felt wrong. So here it is. The no-MMU support should remain unaffected. Please consider for pulling. Tested on ARM only with a busybox build. Changes since v1: - Removed SuperH and Xtensa from the Kconfig rule as they fail to build due to lack of get/put_unaligned_user(). - Clarified some commit logs a bit. diffstat: arch/arm/include/asm/flat.h | 5 +- arch/m68k/include/asm/flat.h | 5 +- fs/Kconfig.binfmt | 3 +- fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c | 38 +--- fs/binfmt_flat.c | 372 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- fs/exec.c | 33 ++++ include/linux/binfmts.h | 2 + 7 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)