public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Brauner <cbrauner@suse.de>,
	dev@opencontainers.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:34:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469115276.2331.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721152648.GA23759@htj.duckdns.org>

On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 11:26 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, James.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:16:34AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > That'd be one side.  The other side is the one moving.  Let's say 
> > > the system admin thing wants to move all processe from A proper 
> > > to B.   It would do that by draining processes from A's procs 
> > > file into B's and even that is multistep and can race.
> > 
> > So the second part is that once we allow the creation of
> > subdirectories, there's no unified tasks file, so there's no way of
> > draining A proper without enumerating and descending into the 
> > cgroupns created subtrees in A?
> 
> Not that.  If it races, it will end up moving processes which are no
> longer in A proper.

So if I as the cgroup ns owner am moving a task from A to A_subdir, the
admin scanning tasks in all of A may miss this task in motion because
all the tasks files can't be scanned atomically?

James

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-21 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18 16:18 [PATCH v1 0/3] cgroup: allow for unprivileged management Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] kernfs: add support for custom per-sb permission hooks Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] cgroup: allow for unprivileged subtree management Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-20 15:45   ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-20 22:59     ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-20 15:51   ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-20 22:58     ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-20 23:02       ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-20 23:18         ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-20 23:19           ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21  7:49             ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-21 14:33               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-07-21 14:37                 ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-21 15:01                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 15:09                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-07-21 14:51                 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-21 14:59                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 15:07                     ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-21 15:04                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 14:52               ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 15:04                 ` James Bottomley
2016-07-21 15:07                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 15:16                     ` James Bottomley
2016-07-21 15:26                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 15:34                         ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-07-21 15:50                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-21 18:16                             ` James Bottomley
2016-07-21 21:06                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-22  8:30                             ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-25 18:38                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-07-25 22:54                                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-07-22  8:24                     ` Aleksa Sarai
2016-07-25 18:44                       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469115276.2331.23.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=adityakali@google.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=cbrauner@suse.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dev@opencontainers.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox