From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, luca.abeni@unitn.it, juri.lelli@arm.com,
xpang@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v6] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:07:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470409675-20935-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> (raw)
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)
However, before Luca's change we were doing
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se)
in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity: we were using pi_se's
parameters (the potential PI donor) for setting up a new entity.
This change removes the useless second parameter of setup_new_dl_entity().
While we are at it we also optimize things further calling setup_new_dl_
entity() only for already queued tasks, since (as pointed out by Xunlei)
we already do the very same update at tasks wakeup time anyway. By doing
so, we don't need to worry about a potential PI donor anymore, as rt_
mutex_setprio() takes care of that already for us.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
Changes from v5:
- simply return if task is not enqueued; improves readability and
reduces indentation
Changes from v4:
- remove dead code checking for boosted status, as never triggered
after rt_mutex_setprio()
Changes from v3:
- call setup_new_dl_entity only if task is enqueued already
Changes from v2:
- optimize by calling rt_mutex_get_top_task only if the task is
boosted (as suggested by Steve)
Changes from v1:
- Steve pointed out that we were actually using the second parameter
to permorm initialization
- Luca confirmed that behavior is slightly changed w.r.t. before his
change
- changelog updated and original behavior restored
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fcb7f0217ff4..03f35f66cf1f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -346,12 +346,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* one, and to (try to!) reconcile itself with its own scheduling
* parameters.
*/
-static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
- struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se)
+static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
+ WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_boosted);
WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
/*
@@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
* future; in fact, we must consider execution overheads (time
* spent on hardirq context, etc.).
*/
- dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_se->dl_deadline;
- dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime;
+ dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + dl_se->dl_deadline;
+ dl_se->runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime;
}
/*
@@ -1720,10 +1720,20 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
+
+ /* If p is not queued we will update its parameters at next wakeup. */
+ if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If p is boosted we already updated its params in
+ * rt_mutex_setprio()->enqueue_task(..., ENQUEUE_REPLENISH),
+ * p's deadline being now already after rq_clock(rq).
+ */
if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
- setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
+ setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl);
- if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
+ if (rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (tsk_nr_cpus_allowed(p) > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded)
queue_push_tasks(rq);
--
2.7.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-05 15:07 Juri Lelli [this message]
2016-08-10 18:04 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Remove useless parameter from setup_new_dl_entity() tip-bot for Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470409675-20935-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).