From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf/core: generalize event->group_flags
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 20:12:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470539577-102094-3-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470539577-102094-1-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com>
Currently, PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE is used in the group_flags field of a
group's leader to indicate that is_software_event(event) is true for all
events in a group. This is the only usage of event->group_flags.
This pattern of setting a group level flags when all events in the group
share a property is useful for the flag introduced in the next patch and
for future CQM/CMT flags. So this patches generalizes group_flags to work
as an aggregate of event level flags.
PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE denotes an inmutable event's property. All other flags
that I intend to add are also determinable at event initialization.
To better convey the above, this patch renames event's group_flags to
group_caps and PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE to PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE.
Individual event flags are stored in the new event->event_caps. Since the
cap flags do not change after event initialization, there is no need to
serialize event_caps. This new field is used when events are added to a
context, similarly to how PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE and is_software_event()
worked.
Lastly, for consistency, updates is_software_event() to rely in event_cap
instead of the context index.
Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
kernel/events/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 7921f4f..fa5617f 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -497,9 +497,12 @@ typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(struct perf_event *,
struct perf_sample_data *,
struct pt_regs *regs);
-enum perf_group_flag {
- PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE = 0x1,
-};
+/*
+ * Event capabilities. For event_caps and groups caps.
+ *
+ * PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE: Is a software event.
+ */
+#define PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE BIT(0)
#define SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS 8
#define SWEVENT_HLIST_SIZE (1 << SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS)
@@ -555,7 +558,12 @@ struct perf_event {
struct hlist_node hlist_entry;
struct list_head active_entry;
int nr_siblings;
- int group_flags;
+
+ /* Not serialized. Only written during event initialization. */
+ int event_caps;
+ /* The cumulative AND of all event_caps for events in this group. */
+ int group_caps;
+
struct perf_event *group_leader;
struct pmu *pmu;
void *pmu_private;
@@ -968,7 +976,7 @@ static inline bool is_sampling_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
static inline int is_software_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
- return event->pmu->task_ctx_nr == perf_sw_context;
+ return event->event_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE;
}
extern struct static_key perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX];
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 96523fd..34049cc 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1405,8 +1405,7 @@ list_add_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
if (event->group_leader == event) {
struct list_head *list;
- if (is_software_event(event))
- event->group_flags |= PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE;
+ event->group_caps = event->event_caps;
list = ctx_group_list(event, ctx);
list_add_tail(&event->group_entry, list);
@@ -1561,9 +1560,7 @@ static void perf_group_attach(struct perf_event *event)
WARN_ON_ONCE(group_leader->ctx != event->ctx);
- if (group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE &&
- !is_software_event(event))
- group_leader->group_flags &= ~PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE;
+ group_leader->group_caps &= event->event_caps;
list_add_tail(&event->group_entry, &group_leader->sibling_list);
group_leader->nr_siblings++;
@@ -1669,7 +1666,7 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
sibling->group_leader = sibling;
/* Inherit group flags from the previous leader */
- sibling->group_flags = event->group_flags;
+ sibling->group_caps = event->group_caps;
WARN_ON_ONCE(sibling->ctx != event->ctx);
}
@@ -2070,7 +2067,7 @@ static int group_can_go_on(struct perf_event *event,
/*
* Groups consisting entirely of software events can always go on.
*/
- if (event->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)
+ if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE)
return 1;
/*
* If an exclusive group is already on, no other hardware
@@ -9359,6 +9356,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
goto err_alloc;
}
+ if (pmu->task_ctx_nr == perf_sw_context)
+ event->event_caps |= PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE;
+
if (group_leader &&
(is_software_event(event) != is_software_event(group_leader))) {
if (is_software_event(event)) {
@@ -9372,7 +9372,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
*/
pmu = group_leader->pmu;
} else if (is_software_event(group_leader) &&
- (group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)) {
+ (group_leader->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE)) {
/*
* In case the group is a pure software group, and we
* try to add a hardware event, move the whole group to
--
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-07 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-07 3:12 [PATCH v2 0/4] remove unnecessary IPI reading uncore events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-07 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf/core: check return value of perf_event_read IPI David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-10 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-08-17 20:53 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-07 3:12 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros [this message]
2016-08-07 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf/core: introduce PMU_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-07 19:10 ` Nilay Vaish
2016-08-07 20:10 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-08 16:12 ` Nilay Vaish
2016-08-09 5:04 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-09 22:28 ` [PATCH " David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-10 18:27 ` Nilay Vaish
2016-08-08 10:00 ` [PATCH v3 " David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-07 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86: use PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG in uncore events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-08-10 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] remove unnecessary IPI reading " Nilay Vaish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470539577-102094-3-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com \
--to=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).