From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753618AbcHRHsI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:48:08 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57103 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753119AbcHRHsG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:48:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1471506195.2157.3.camel@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Type-C Port Manager
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>, Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>,
        Chandra Sekhar Anagani <chandra.sekhar.anagani@intel.com>,
        Pranav Tipnis <pranav.tipnis@intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:43:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1471471476-53251-1-git-send-email-groeck@chromium.org>
References: <1471471476-53251-1-git-send-email-groeck@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 15:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The following series of patches implements a USB Type-C Port Manager
> using the pending USB Type-C class code as basis. The code is still
> WIP,
> but I think it is important to get feedback from the community at this
> point.

Hi,

a question on design. What happens if the system wants to suspend while
we are in the middle of a power negotiation?

	Regards
		Oliver