From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756236AbbE2QXf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 29 May 2015 12:23:35 -0400
Received: from forward15o.cmail.yandex.net ([37.9.109.212]:37330 "EHLO
	forward15o.cmail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752493AbbE2QX0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 29 May 2015 12:23:26 -0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Ionut Alexa <ionut.m.alexa@gmail.com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <635991432718342@web2o.yandex.ru>
References: <1432575832.6866.29.camel@odin.com> <20150526194251.GB6978@redhat.com> <635991432718342@web2o.yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] Reduction globality of tasklist_lock
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <147161432916600@web19o.yandex.ru>
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:23:20 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

27.05.2015, 12:30, "Kirill Tkhai" <tkhai@yandex.ru>:
> Hi, Oleg,
>
> 26.05.2015, 22:44, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>:
>> šOn 05/25, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> ššIt's like gone BKL,
>> šYes...
>>
>> šKirill. I just want to let you know that I am not going to ignore
>> šthis series. I'll try very much to review it this week.
>>
>> šBut I have to admit this scares me ;) and I don't feel this all
>> šis right. We will see.
>
> Nice to hear. I'll wait for your commentaries.
> A couple of words how this all was tested.
>
> The strace test was endless kernel compilation using standard or
> straced gcc/make (CC="strace -o /dev/null gcc" ) and periodical
> killing gcc, make or strace. No problems were observed. If there
> is an idea of a test, which is mostly for threads, I'll be happy
> to hear it.

I found some problems in the patchset and going to fix them. Please,
ignore it. I'll send new series next week.

Kirill