From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755424AbcHSSjd (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:39:33 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0119.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.119]:53618 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755056AbcHSSjc (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:39:32 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:968:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3743:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3873:3874:4321:5007:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11783:11914:12048:12517:12519:12679:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:14659:21080:21451:30054:30060:30064:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: mint43_8cee5069c683f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1968 Message-ID: <1471631966.3893.29.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] staging: lustre: last missing patches for lustre 2.6 From: Joe Perches To: James Simmons , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Andreas Dilger , Oleg Drokin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lustre Development List Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:39:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1471630051-26700-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> References: <1471630051-26700-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 14:07 -0400, James Simmons wrote: > Resolved the last remain bug that prevented earlier submission. > This covers the remaining patches that were missing from the > upstream client that was in Lustre 2.6 except for the work for > LU-2484. The work for LU-2484 depends on the stat infrastructure > that was removed earlier from the upstream client. That will > be done at a later date. In reality this is a pre-2.7 client > due to the landing of many patches earlier from lustre 2.7. > In any case this is a huge milestone for the lustre client in > the linux kernel. Couple things: 1: I'd like to see the lustre #include files separated into    only two internal/external directories akin to the    include/linux and include/uapi directories used by linux.    Is this a reasonable thing? and 2: James, you seem to aggregate a lot of lustre patches and    yet you are not a listed maintainer.  Should you be?