Re: [PATCH] staging: android: lowmemorykiller.c: Fix checkpatch warning

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 17:36 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:26:48PM +0300, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Anson Jacob wrote:
> > > 
> > > Fix checkpatch.pl 'line over 80 characters' warning
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Jacob <ansonjacob.aj@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > > index 45a1b4e..80d7adf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > > @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
> > >  	int array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lowmem_adj);
> > >  	int other_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) - totalreserve_pages;
> > >  	int other_file = global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES) -
> > > -						global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
> > > -						total_swapcache_pages();
> > > +				global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
> > > +				total_swapcache_pages();
> > >  
> > >  	if (lowmem_adj_size < array_size)
> > >  		array_size = lowmem_adj_size;
> > Indeed original alignment on opening brace here doesn't make sense.
> > I don't mind if your patch gets accepted, but out of curiosity I have opened
> > this file in vim with kernel coding style plugin loaded
> > (https://github.com/vivien/vim-linux-coding-style), selected the affected
> > lines, and reindented the selection by pressing 'gq'. It ended up with this,
> > being both shorter and simpler:
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > index 45a1b4e..3aef467 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > @@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
> >  	int array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lowmem_adj);
> >  	int other_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) - totalreserve_pages;
> >  	int other_file = global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES) -
> > -						global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
> > -						total_swapcache_pages();
> > +		global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) - total_swapcache_pages();
> The original patch here is nicer to read, don't you think?

Strictly, these should probably be unsigned long instead of int
as that's the return type of global_[node_]page_state().

Maybe something like the below, but then maybe other_free/file
should become unsigned long too.
---
 drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
index 45a1b4e..e8e1eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
@@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	int selected_tasksize = 0;
 	short selected_oom_score_adj;
 	int array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lowmem_adj);
-	int other_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) - totalreserve_pages;
-	int other_file = global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES) -
-						global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
-						total_swapcache_pages();
+	unsigned long nr_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES);
+	unsigned long nr_file = global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES);
+	unsigned long nr_shmem = global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM);
+	int other_free = nr_free - totalreserve_pages;
+	int other_file = nr_file - nr_shmem - total_swapcache_pages();
 
 	if (lowmem_adj_size < array_size)
 		array_size = lowmem_adj_size;