From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752057AbcIHAtl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:49:41 -0400
Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:36378 "EHLO mga05.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750772AbcIHAtd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:49:33 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,298,1470726000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1036814210"
Message-ID: <1473295771.154359.44.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in
 intel_pstate and schedutil
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 17:49:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3823270.hR1Z92UVHK@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <2730042.XLMy9dAKI1@vostro.rjw.lan>
         <20160908002226.GC15431@graphite.smuckle.net>
         <1473294950.154359.38.camel@linux.intel.com>
         <3823270.hR1Z92UVHK@vostro.rjw.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 02:44 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:35:50 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 17:22 -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some
> > > > benchmarks you
> > > > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way
> > > > or
> > > > another),
> > > > please do that and let me know what you've found.
> > > 
> > > LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the
> > > intel_pstate ones).
> > > 
> > > I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android
> > > audio,
> > > video or
> > > idle usecases on my hikey 96board.
> > Did you see any performance regression on Android workloads?
> 
> That's with schedutil and IOwait boost.  Why would performance
> regress?
Some Android tests reach thermal limits and aggressive throttling
causes performance issues. 

Thanks,
Srinivas


> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>