public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 01/23] clocksource: sh_cmt: compute rate before registration again
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:51:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473533513.19464.3.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609101416420.32361@nanos>

On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 14:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>	if (foo)
> 		bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> 		    CONST);)
> 	else
> 		rab();
> 
> 
> Is NOT. Simply because the pattern of a 'if ()' condition without braces
> suggests a single line statement to follow. Then the reading flow stops
> because there is more than one line. While:

> 	if (foo) {
> 		bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> 		    CONST);)
> 	} else {
> 		rab();
> 	}

While I mostly agree, CodingStyle says:

------------------------------------------------------

Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.

	if (condition)
		action();

and

	if (condition)
		do_this();
	else
		do_that();

------------------------------------------------------

Perhaps that should be "with single line statements" instead.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-10 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-09 20:00 [RFC v6 00/23] adapt clockevents frequencies to mono clock Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 01/23] clocksource: sh_cmt: compute rate before registration again Nicolai Stange
2016-09-10 12:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-10 18:51     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-09-10 19:11     ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 02/23] clocksource: sh_tmu: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 03/23] clocksource: em_sti: split clock prepare and enable steps Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 04/23] clocksource: em_sti: compute rate before registration Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 05/23] clocksource: h8300_timer8: don't reset rate in ->set_state_oneshot() Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 06/23] clockevents: make clockevents_config() static Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 07/23] many clockevent drivers: set ->min_delta_ticks and ->max_delta_ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 08/23] arch/s390/kernel/time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 09/23] arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 10/23] arch/tile/kernel/time: " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 11/23] clockevents: always initialize ->min_delta_ns and ->max_delta_ns Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 12/23] many clockevent drivers: don't set " Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 13/23] clockevents: introduce CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_NO_ADJUST flag Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 14/23] clockevents: decouple ->max_delta_ns from ->max_delta_ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:00 ` [RFC v6 15/23] clockevents: do comparison of delta against minimum in terms of cycles Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 16/23] clockevents: clockevents_program_min_delta(): don't set ->next_event Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 17/23] clockevents: use ->min_delta_ticks_adjusted to program minimum delta Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 18/23] clockevents: min delta increment: calculate min_delta_ns from ticks Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 19/23] timer_list: print_tickdevice(): calculate ->min_delta_ns dynamically Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 20/23] clockevents: purge ->min_delta_ns Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 21/23] clockevents: initial support for mono to raw time conversion Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 22/23] clockevents: make setting of ->mult and ->mult_adjusted atomic Nicolai Stange
2016-09-09 20:18 ` [RFC v6 23/23] timekeeping: inform clockevents about freq adjustments Nicolai Stange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473533513.19464.3.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox