From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764598AbcINTKU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:10:20 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0212.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.212]:60136 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764247AbcINTKR (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:10:17 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:421:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4250:4321:4470:5007:6691:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12740:12760:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:21451:30012:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: ducks61_1b8d0888f170c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1869 Message-ID: <1473880188.32273.49.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Minimize checkpatch induced patches... From: Joe Perches To: Christian Borntraeger , Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , Andy Whitcroft , Jonathan Corbet , Josh Triplett , "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:09:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <17f24fb7-6f69-63dd-d253-865509467717@de.ibm.com> References: <1473876366.32273.40.camel@perches.com> <554bcd26-f513-adf1-1a01-8b0ca9ff4aed@de.ibm.com> <20160914183354.GA21814@kroah.com> <17f24fb7-6f69-63dd-d253-865509467717@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.21.91-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 20:54 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 09/14/2016 08:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > That's not true, I _WANT_ checkpatch cleanups for the portion of the > > kernel I maintain. It keeps the code correct, up to date, easier to > > maintain, and in doing so, we have found real bugs over time. > Assuming that there are others with the same opinions that means that > Joes patch is not the right solution? The patch doesn't forbid that. It just means any checkpatch induced change outside of drivers/staging would generally be intentional and would not commonly be submitted by inexperienced developers.