From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753952AbcIUG7i (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 02:59:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34328 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750862AbcIUG7f (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2016 02:59:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1474441172.27308.19.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes From: Mike Galbraith To: Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Jason Low , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 08:59:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1474378963-15496-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> References: <1474378963-15496-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1474378963-15496-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 09:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > This patch introduces a new futex implementation called > throughput-optimized (TO) futexes. nit: 'TO' sounds way too much like timeout... TP? You even use 'to' as shorthand for timeout in the next patch. > /* > -> > > * Wake robust non-PI futexes here. The wakeup of > -> > > * PI futexes happens in exit_pi_state(): > +> > > * Wake robust non-PI/TO futexes here. The wakeup of > +> > > * PI/TO futexes happens in exit_pi_state(): > > > > */ nit: comment attracted my eye during high speed scroll-by. -Mike