From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034694AbcIVVDu (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:03:50 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0217.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.217]:52544 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030267AbcIVVDs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:03:48 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6119:7514:7903:9038:10004:10400:10450:10455:10848:11232:11658:11914:12740:12760:13069:13311:13357:13439:14181:14659:14721:19904:19999:21080:21433:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: man67_20d82b3eb4809 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1374 Message-ID: <1474578224.8253.30.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: wlan-ng: fixed a coding style issue From: Joe Perches To: becher.jannik@gmail.com, Andrey Utkin Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:03:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160922205218.ndkbjkcyfnfs22jz@breaker.fritz.box> References: <20160922191146.6420-1-Becher.Jannik@gmail.com> <20160922203201.33pwuzd3lncyjncf@zver> <20160922205218.ndkbjkcyfnfs22jz@breaker.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.21.91-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 22:52 +0200, becher.jannik@gmail.com wrote: > I always wondered why I shouldn't make more than one change in a patch, > but in all talks I watched they said that it's easier for them to merge > small patches. > > So you think I should make one "big" patch and resend it? Make separate patches for each "type" of change. Here it would be removing unnecessary space before all casts in the same file or for all specific driver files.