From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756106AbcIWMRV (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:17:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:33512 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965228AbcIWMRN (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:17:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1474633030.4025.11.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm: Remove dm_bufio_cond_resched() From: Mike Galbraith To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mikulas Patocka , Mike Snitzer , Alasdair Kergon , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Joe Thornber Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:17:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20160913084520.GA5012@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160913133959.GA22833@redhat.com> <20160919105325.GW5016@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160923073435.GL2794@worktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 10:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Is anybody still using PREEMPT_NONE? Most workloads also care about > > latency to some extend. Lots of code has explicit cond_resched() and > > doesn't worry. > > Dunno. But I bet there are workloads which love it. SUSE definitely uses it. I had presumed that was enterprise standard. -Mike