From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "danielmentz@google.com" <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:38:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474893488.4184.14.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2F3rBjKsEGpbUMhGLthx-Ue=LQCqEPtbB20bG2P=D2nbwYsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:04 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 15:37 -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. Buildroot routinely runs the strip
> > > command on .ko files before installing them on the target. I was only
> > > looking at the .ko files *after* running the strip command. No, the
> > > interim patch was not in my tree.
> >
> > Well are you sure buildroot really touches modules in Linux kernel build folder?
> > Buildroot just runs a simple "make" command in "output/build/linux-x.y".
>
> Sorry, that was phrased badly. Buildroot does not touch the modules in
> the Linux kernel build folder. Modules are stripped in the target
> directory as you described.
So every is as expected now for you or there're still thing you don't like?
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-26 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 21:49 [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding Vineet Gupta
2016-09-20 1:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Daniel Mentz
2016-09-20 6:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:39 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:59 ` modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame) Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 22:37 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-23 10:38 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-24 1:04 ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-26 12:38 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-09-26 18:51 ` Daniel Mentz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474893488.4184.14.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).