public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Harman Kalra <harman4linux@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.co
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: i4l: Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over printk(KERN_DEBUG... " fixed
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:49:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475873387.1945.23.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475859476-3524-1-git-send-email-harman4linux@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 22:27 +0530, Harman Kalra wrote:
> Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over printk(KERN_DEBUG... " and "few line more than 80 character" fixed

The commit subject and message doesn't match the code change.

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/i4l/icn/icn.h b/drivers/staging/i4l/icn/icn.h
[]
> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
>  
>  /* some useful macros for debugging */
>  #ifdef ICN_DEBUG_PORT
> -#define OUTB_P(v, p) {printk(KERN_DEBUG "icn: outb_p(0x%02x,0x%03x)\n", v, p); outb_p(v, p);}
> +#define OUTB_P(v, p) \
> +		{printk(KERN_DEBUG "icn: outb_p(0x%02x,0x%03x)\n", v, p); outb_p(v, p); }

This would be better with a do {...} while (0) guard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-07 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-04 20:53 [PATCH] staging: i4l: icn: fixed some errors and warnings caught by checkpatch.pl Harman Kalra
2016-10-05  6:52 ` Greg KH
2016-10-07 16:57   ` [PATCH 1/3] Staging: i4l: Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over printk(KERN_DEBUG... " fixed Harman Kalra
2016-10-07 16:57     ` [PATCH 2/3] Staging: i4l: Error "open brace { should be on the previous line" fixed Harman Kalra
2016-10-09 15:00       ` Greg KH
2016-10-09 15:35         ` [PATCH 1/3] Staging: i4l: icn: Fixed open brace should be on previous line error Harman Kalra
2016-10-09 15:35           ` [PATCH 2/3] Staging: i4l: icn: prefer pr_* instead of printk Harman Kalra
2016-10-09 15:35           ` [PATCH 3/3] Staging: i4l: icn: Fixed open brace should be on previous line error Harman Kalra
2016-10-07 16:57     ` [PATCH 3/3] Staging: i4l: Error "open brace { should be on the previous line" fixed Harman Kalra
2016-10-09 14:59       ` Greg KH
2016-10-07 20:49     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-10-09 14:59     ` [PATCH 1/3] Staging: i4l: Warning "Prefer "pr_debug over printk(KERN_DEBUG... " fixed Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1475873387.1945.23.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=harman4linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.co \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox