public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
To: khilman@linaro.org, heiko@sntech.de
Cc: zhangqing@rock-chips.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tfiga@chromium.org,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] soc: rockchip: avoid infinite loop for power domain
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 02:16:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476296168-29154-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> (raw)

In some cases, we have met the infinite loop in
rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request() or rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain().

As the crosbug.com/p/57351 reported, the boot hangs right after this
[1.629163] bootconsole [uart8250] disabled
[1.639286] [drm:drm_core_init] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[1.645926] [drm:drm_get_platform_dev] Initialized vgem 1.0.0 20120112..
[1.654558] iommu: Adding device ff8f0000.vop to group 0
[1.660569] iommu: Adding device ff900000.vop to group 1
<hang>

This patch adds the error message and timeout to avoid infinite loop if
it fails to get the ack.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- As the Tomasz & Heiko feedback on http://crosreview.com/395589:
  * Also, need the timeout for rockchip_do_set_power_domain.
  * s/target_on/is_on, s/target_idle/is_idle.
  * unsigned int instear of u32.

 drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 7acd151..260fbcc 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/pm_clock.h>
 #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
@@ -105,12 +106,24 @@ static bool rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
 	return (val & pd_info->idle_mask) == pd_info->idle_mask;
 }
 
+static unsigned int rockchip_pmu_read_ack(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	unsigned int val;
+
+	regmap_read(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->ack_offset, &val);
+	return val;
+}
+
 static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
 					 bool idle)
 {
 	const struct rockchip_domain_info *pd_info = pd->info;
+	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = &pd->genpd;
 	struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
 	unsigned int val;
+	unsigned int target_ack;
+	bool is_idle;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (pd_info->req_mask == 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -120,12 +133,26 @@ static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
 
 	dsb(sy);
 
-	do {
-		regmap_read(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->ack_offset, &val);
-	} while ((val & pd_info->ack_mask) != (idle ? pd_info->ack_mask : 0));
+	/* Wait util idle_ack = 1 */
+	target_ack = idle ? pd_info->ack_mask : 0;
+	ret = readx_poll_timeout_atomic(rockchip_pmu_read_ack, pmu, val,
+				(val & pd_info->ack_mask) == target_ack,
+				0, 10000);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pmu->dev,
+			"failed to get ack on domain '%s', val=0x%x\n",
+			genpd->name, val);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-	while (rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle(pd) != idle)
-		cpu_relax();
+	ret = readx_poll_timeout_atomic(rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle, pd,
+					is_idle, is_idle == idle, 0, 10000);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pmu->dev,
+			"failed to set idle on domain '%s', val=%d\n",
+			genpd->name, is_idle);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -198,6 +225,8 @@ static void rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
 					     bool on)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
+	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = &pd->genpd;
+	bool is_on;
 
 	if (pd->info->pwr_mask == 0)
 		return;
@@ -207,8 +236,13 @@ static void rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
 
 	dsb(sy);
 
-	while (rockchip_pmu_domain_is_on(pd) != on)
-		cpu_relax();
+	if (readx_poll_timeout_atomic(rockchip_pmu_domain_is_on, pd, is_on,
+				      is_on == on, 0, 10000)) {
+		dev_err(pmu->dev,
+			"failed to set domain '%s', val=%d\n",
+			genpd->name, is_on);
+		return;
+	}
 }
 
 static int rockchip_pd_power(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd, bool power_on)
-- 
1.9.1

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-12 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 18:16 Caesar Wang [this message]
2016-11-01 23:22 ` [PATCH v2] soc: rockchip: avoid infinite loop for power domain Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476296168-29154-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --to=wxt@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox