public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig.h: remove config_enabled() macro
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:04:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476957892.28989.24.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476616078-32252-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

Masahiro,

A few comments regarding, I guess, future work.

On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 20:07 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The use of config_enabled() is ambiguous.  For config options,
> IS_ENABLED(), IS_REACHABLE(), etc. will make intention clearer.
> Sometimes config_enabled() has been used for non-config options
> because it is useful to check whether the given symbol is defined
> or not.
> 
> I have been tackling on deprecating config_enabled(), and now is the
> time to finish this work.
> 
> Some new users have appeared for v4.9-rc1, but it is trivial to
> replace them:
> 
>  - arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
>   replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() because
>   CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64 and CONFIG_EFI are boolean.
> 
>  - include/asm-generic/export.h
>   replace config_enabled() with __is_defined().
> 
> Then, config_enabled() can be removed now.
> 
> Going forward, please use IS_ENABLED(), IS_REACHABLE(), etc. for
> config options, and __is_defined() for non-config symbols.

There are about a dozen instances of IS_ENABLED() that target something
other than a kconfig macros. Are you planning to convert those to
__is_defined() too? 

> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

> --- a/include/linux/kconfig.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kconfig.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
>   * When CONFIG_BOOGER is not defined, we generate a (... 1, 0) pair, and when
>   * the last step cherry picks the 2nd arg, we get a zero.
>   */
> -#define config_enabled(cfg)		___is_defined(cfg)

Is there a reason to keep using the double underscore prefix?

>  #define __is_defined(x)			___is_defined(x)
>  #define ___is_defined(val)		____is_defined(__ARG_PLACEHOLDER_##val)
>  #define ____is_defined(arg1_or_junk)	__take_second_arg(arg1_or_junk 1, 0)

__is_defined() is now meant to be used generally, and not just on
kconfig macros. Can it be moved into another header?


Paul Bolle

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-20 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-16 11:07 [PATCH] kconfig.h: remove config_enabled() macro Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-16 16:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-10-16 18:44 ` hpa
2016-10-17  2:10   ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-20 10:04 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2016-10-20 12:06   ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-20 12:44     ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-20 13:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-10-20 15:02       ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476957892.28989.24.camel@tiscali.nl \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox