From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig.h: remove config_enabled() macro
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476957892.28989.24.camel@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476616078-32252-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Masahiro,
A few comments regarding, I guess, future work.
On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 20:07 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The use of config_enabled() is ambiguous. For config options,
> IS_ENABLED(), IS_REACHABLE(), etc. will make intention clearer.
> Sometimes config_enabled() has been used for non-config options
> because it is useful to check whether the given symbol is defined
> or not.
>
> I have been tackling on deprecating config_enabled(), and now is the
> time to finish this work.
>
> Some new users have appeared for v4.9-rc1, but it is trivial to
> replace them:
>
> - arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c
> replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() because
> CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64 and CONFIG_EFI are boolean.
>
> - include/asm-generic/export.h
> replace config_enabled() with __is_defined().
>
> Then, config_enabled() can be removed now.
>
> Going forward, please use IS_ENABLED(), IS_REACHABLE(), etc. for
> config options, and __is_defined() for non-config symbols.
There are about a dozen instances of IS_ENABLED() that target something
other than a kconfig macros. Are you planning to convert those to
__is_defined() too?
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> --- a/include/linux/kconfig.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kconfig.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
> * When CONFIG_BOOGER is not defined, we generate a (... 1, 0) pair, and when
> * the last step cherry picks the 2nd arg, we get a zero.
> */
> -#define config_enabled(cfg) ___is_defined(cfg)
Is there a reason to keep using the double underscore prefix?
> #define __is_defined(x) ___is_defined(x)
> #define ___is_defined(val) ____is_defined(__ARG_PLACEHOLDER_##val)
> #define ____is_defined(arg1_or_junk) __take_second_arg(arg1_or_junk 1, 0)
__is_defined() is now meant to be used generally, and not just on
kconfig macros. Can it be moved into another header?
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-16 11:07 [PATCH] kconfig.h: remove config_enabled() macro Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-16 16:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-10-16 18:44 ` hpa
2016-10-17 2:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-20 10:04 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2016-10-20 12:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-10-20 12:44 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-20 13:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-10-20 15:02 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476957892.28989.24.camel@tiscali.nl \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox