From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022AbcJTXjp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:39:45 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53594 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751605AbcJTXjn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:39:43 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: ELNeLEhW8ZEXGW0dQs8Uv0BSbkoURggodPtZFDAsD54/ 1477006781 Message-ID: <1477006776.3207.14.camel@themaw.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] vfs - change d_manage() to take a struct path From: Ian Kent To: Andrew Morton Cc: autofs mailing list , Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-fsdevel , Omar Sandoval , Al Viro Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:39:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20161019124031.94a44fbdd0970989f05d1893@linux-foundation.org> References: <20161011053352.27645.83962.stgit@pluto.themaw.net> <20161019124031.94a44fbdd0970989f05d1893@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 12:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:33:52 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > > > For the autofs module to be able to reliably check if a dentry is a > > mountpoint in a multiple namespace environment the ->d_manage() dentry > > operation will need to take a path argument instead of a dentry. > > This patchset contains lots of ViroStuff. I'll queue it up for some > testing and will go into wait-and-see mode. Thanks Andrew. Maybe Al has been too busy to comment, he has been on the Cc from the start. Hopefully this email will prompt a review, Al? > > Some patches had an explicit From: Ian Kent and some > did not. I assumed that this was intended for all patches. So all > patches now have different From: and Signed-off-by: email addresses. > Unclear if this was your intent ;) Umm ... sorry about that, I didn't pay enough attention to the From of the patches when I resurrected them from an earlier attempt at this. Since the time I did this with an earlier patch series I have elected to not change my git config and set these in the local tree config so it shouldn't happen for new work. I'll pay special attention to this if I need to resurrect any other older patches too. I know this looks confusing and isn't the best but both email addresses have been present on my gpg key for a long time so it's verifiable the patches are from me. Once again sorry about that. Ian