From: Lyude Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove redundant reprobe in i915_drm_resume
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:11:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478189515.28703.9.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478189469.28703.8.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 12:11 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 16:02 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:42:37AM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Weine's investigation on benchmarking the suspend/resume process pointed
> > > out a lot of the time in suspend/resume is being spent reprobing. While
> > > the reprobing process is a lengthy one for good reason, we don't need to
> > > hold up the entire suspend/resume process while we wait for it to
> > > finish. Luckily as it turns out, we already trigger a full connector
> > > reprobe in i915_hpd_poll_init_work(), so we can just ditch reprobing in
> > > i915_drm_resume() entirely.
> > >
> > > This won't lead to less time spent resuming just yet since now the
> > > bottleneck will be waiting for the mode_config lock in
> > > drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(), since that will be held as long as
> > > i915_hpd_poll_init_work() is reprobing all of the connectors. But we'll
> > > address that in the next patch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > index bfb2efd..532cc0f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > @@ -1602,8 +1602,6 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > * notifications.
> > > * */
> > > intel_hpd_init(dev_priv);
> > > - /* Config may have changed between suspend and resume */
> > > - drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dev);
> >
> > The comment is still apt. This code is known to be broken since it
> > doesn't detect a change in monitors (e.g. a change in external connectors
> > from docking) between suspend and resend. We still have to send the uevent.
> >
> > + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(dev);
>
> I might not have explained myself very well. The way things should look with
> this patch is like this:
>
> i915_drm_resume()
> -> intel_hpd_init()
> -> sets dev_priv->hotplug.poll_enabled to true
Whoops, s/true/false/
> -> schedules dev_priv->hotplug.poll_init_work
> -> continue resume…
>
> at the same time:
>
> i915_hpd_poll_init_work() gets scheduled and starts
> -> since dev_priv->hotplug.poll_enabled == false, drm_helper_hpd_irq_event()
> is called
> -> drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() reprobes connectors
> -> if anything changed, drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() gets called.
>
> So we're still polling the connectors when coming out of resume just like
> before, except now we're doing it without needlessly making the whole resume
> process stall until we're done. We're also no longer reprobing display
> connectors twice…
>
> >
> >
> > which also depends upon us actually reseting the connector->status to
> > unknown in drm_mode_config_reset(), Daniel!
> > -Chris
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-03 15:42 [PATCH 0/2] Small fixes to speed up resume Lyude
2016-11-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove redundant reprobe in i915_drm_resume Lyude
2016-11-03 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2016-11-03 16:11 ` Lyude Paul
2016-11-03 16:11 ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2016-11-03 16:25 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-03 16:42 ` Lyude Paul
2016-11-03 18:50 ` David Weinehall
2016-11-03 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Reinit polling before hpd when resuming Lyude
2016-11-03 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Weinehall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478189515.28703.9.camel@redhat.com \
--to=cpaul@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox