From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752831AbcKIIKz (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 03:10:55 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:53400 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752561AbcKIIKx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 03:10:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1478679046.4345.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning From: Johannes Berg To: Kalle Valo , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Stanislav Yakovlev , Jouni Malinen , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 09:10:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mvh9qwhi.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <20161024153918.2810634-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20161024153918.2810634-2-arnd@arndb.de> <87mvh9qwhi.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Ideally we prefer that drivers/net/wireless and net/wireless changes > are > split into different patches as they get applied to different trees. > Johannes, is it ok if I take this change through my tree this time? Sure, please do, thanks. (I don't particularly care about the lib80211 stuff anyway) johannes