From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@canonical.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genetlink: fix unsigned int comparison with less than zero
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:37:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478986636.4226.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpW=q4nm97dNouSL19Cr2cEWT9xQHXAm4CNJk=AY8z_2MA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20161110_181214_593279_4F3243C4)
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 09:11 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > family->id is unsigned, so the less than zero check for
> > failure return from idr_alloc is never true and so the error exit
> > is never handled. Instead, assign err and check if this is less
> > than zero since this is a signed integer.
>
> Why family->id can't be just signed int? For me it should be.
I suppose it could be, since family IDs are allocated in a 16-bit range
anyway. But family IDs can also never actually be negative, so having
an unsigned int in the struct makes sense too.
I tend to think this patch is fine.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-12 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-10 15:57 [PATCH] genetlink: fix unsigned int comparison with less than zero Colin King
2016-11-10 17:11 ` Cong Wang
2016-11-12 21:37 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-11-13 5:25 ` Cong Wang
2016-11-13 7:31 ` Johannes Berg
2016-11-13 17:15 ` David Miller
2016-11-14 6:29 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478986636.4226.4.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=tycho.andersen@canonical.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).