From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756763AbcKVUVW (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:21:22 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:55910 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751311AbcKVUVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:21:20 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,682,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="904475642" Message-ID: <1479846079.3064.16.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: Extend scheduler's asym packing From: Tim Chen To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, Srinivas Pandruvada Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:21:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161122100959.GC3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <0c494b134a93e89ebf48e45719a6b864d4ac96b7.1478805832.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> <20161122100959.GC3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 (3.18.5.2-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >  > > Not a big fan of that part.. would not something like the below cure > that? > > It would be slightly less optimal for Power7 but would actually be > faster (on average) for the ITMT case, but most importantly, it does > away with that extra weak function. Okay. I have made this change to get rid off the extra weak function. However, two patches are affected.  So I think it is cleaner to refresh the whole patch set.  I'll send out the refreshed v8 patch set separately. Thanks. Tim