public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
To: "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"  <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "vinod.koul@intel.com" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com" <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"vireshk@kernel.org" <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	"linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"christian.ruppert@alitech.com" <christian.ruppert@alitech.com>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] DW DMAC: add multi-block property to device tree
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:40:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480074030.2534.46.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480003098.20074.18.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 17:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 17:52 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 18:04 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > > 
> > > Several versions of DW DMAC have multi block transfers hardware
> > > support. Hardware support of multi block transfers is disabled
> > > by default if we use DT to configure DMAC and software emulation
> > > of multi block transfers used instead.
> > > Add multi-block property, so it is possible to enable hardware
> > > multi block transfers (if present) via DT.
> > > 
> > > Switch from per device is_nollp variable to multi_block array
> > > to be able enable/disable multi block transfers separately per
> > > channel.
> > Thanks for an update. Basically I'm fine with this one.
> > 
> > So, we still have question about autoconfiguration in SPEAr SoCs,
> > and
> > your ARC SoC but it's a different story. I would expect once you
> > will
> > clarify it.
> > 
> > Another one is minor listed below, otherwise
> > 
> > Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > > 
> > > @@ -152,6 +154,11 @@ dw_dma_parse_dt(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > >  			pdata->data_width[tmp] = BIT(arr[tmp] &
> > > 0x07);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	if (!of_property_read_u32_array(np, "multi-block", chan,
> > > nr_channels)) {
> > > +		for (tmp = 0; tmp < nr_channels; tmp++)
> > > +			pdata->multi_block[tmp] = chan[tmp];
> > ...mb (as short of multi-block) would suit better.
> Oh, sorry, guys, but one more important thing. If there is no such
> property, keep a default to "supported". Otherwise you will break old
> (working) DTBs.
Should I remove explicit declaration "multi-block" property from
existing DTS (which I added during v5 patch iteration)?

I mean that:
---------------------->8-----------------------
+			multi-block = <1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1>;
---------------------->8-----------------------

We don't actually need it, if we use use 1 ("supported") as "multi-
block" property default value.

-- 
 Paltsev Eugeniy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-25 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-24 15:04 [PATCH v5 0/2] DW DMAC: update device tree Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-11-24 15:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] DW DMAC: enable memory-to-memory transfers support Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-11-24 15:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] DW DMAC: add multi-block property to device tree Eugeniy Paltsev
2016-11-24 15:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-11-24 15:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-11-25 11:40       ` Eugeniy Paltsev [this message]
2016-11-25 11:48         ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1480074030.2534.46.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=eugeniy.paltsev@synopsys.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christian.ruppert@alitech.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox